首页> 外文OA文献 >The Brief Problem Monitor-Parent Form (BPM-P), a short version of the child behavior checklist : psychometric properties in Spanish 6- to 8-year-old children
【2h】

The Brief Problem Monitor-Parent Form (BPM-P), a short version of the child behavior checklist : psychometric properties in Spanish 6- to 8-year-old children

机译:简短的问题监控者父母表格(BPM-P),儿童行为清单的简短版本:西班牙6至8岁儿童的心理测量特性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We provide the first validation data on the Spanish version of the Brief Problem Monitor-Parent form (BPM-P), a recently developed abbreviated version of the 120-item Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6 to 18 (CBCL/6–18) in young schoolchildren. Parents of a community sample of 521 children aged 6–8 answered the CBCL/6–18 yearly, and the 19 BPM-P items were examined; parents also provided different measures of psychopathology. Confirmatory factor analysis of the expected 3-factor model (attention, externalizing, and internalizing) showed adequate fit (root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA ≤ .057), and measurement invariance across sex and age was observed. Internal consistency for the derived scores was satisfactory (ω ≥ .83). Concurrent validity with the equivalent scale scores of the original full CBCL/6–18 (r ≥ .84) and convergent validity with parents’ ratings of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores (r ≥ .52) were good. BPM-P scores at age 7 showed good predictive accuracy for discriminating the use of mental health services (OR ≥ 1.12), functional impairment (B ≤ −1.25), and the presence of the corresponding disorders diagnosed with an independent clinical interview, both cross-sectionally at age 7 and longitudinally at age 8 (OR ≥ 1.24). The BPM-P provides reliable and valid scores as a very brief follow-up and screening tool for assessing behavioral and emotional problems in young schoolchildren
机译:我们提供了西班牙语的“简短问题监控者-父母”表格(BPM-P)的第一份验证数据,该表格是最近开发的120项针对6至18岁的儿童行为清单的缩写版本(CBCL / 6-18)。年轻的学童。社区样本的521名6-8岁儿童的父母每年回答CBCL / 6-18岁,并检查了19个BPM-P项目。父母还提供了不同的心理病理测量方法。对预期的三因素模型(注意,外在和内在化)的验证性因素分析显示出足够的拟合度(近似均方根误差,RMSEA≤.057),并且观察到了性别和年龄的测量不变性。得出分数的内部一致性令人满意(ω≥.83)。与原始CBCL / 6–18的等效量表分数同时有效(r≥.84),与父母对强项和困难问卷的得分(r≥.52)的收敛性都很好。 BPM-P评分在7岁时显示出良好的预测准确性,可以区分使用精神卫生服务(OR≥1.12),功能障碍(B≤-1.25)和是否存在通过独立的临床访谈诊断出的相应疾病,两者-分别在7岁和8岁(OR≥1.24)时纵向。 BPM-P提供可靠且有效的评分,作为评估学龄儿童行为和情绪问题的非常简短的跟踪和筛选工具

著录项

  • 作者

    Penelo Werner, Eva;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号